<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First-Best, Second-Best</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.killtenrats.com/2007/09/16/first-best-second-best/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2007/09/16/first-best-second-best/</link>
	<description>a group of adventurers on an epic quest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:28:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: First-Best/Second-Best, at the Theater and in Open RvR &#124; Kill Ten Rats</title>
		<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2007/09/16/first-best-second-best/comment-page-1/#comment-28322</link>
		<dc:creator>First-Best/Second-Best, at the Theater and in Open RvR &#124; Kill Ten Rats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 05:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killtenrats.com/?p=1233#comment-28322</guid>
		<description>[...] have mentioned before that second-best might demand movements further away from first-best. That is, if you cannot get [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have mentioned before that second-best might demand movements further away from first-best. That is, if you cannot get [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yunk</title>
		<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2007/09/16/first-best-second-best/comment-page-1/#comment-24155</link>
		<dc:creator>yunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killtenrats.com/?p=1233#comment-24155</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s use for RPers and just people wanting to look nicer is obvious.

For PvPers, I don&#039;t see what&#039;s wrong with letting people hide their &quot;True&quot; armor. Most casual pvpers won&#039;t know the armor by look anyway. Plus, it&#039;s just one more way to obfuscate. If it&#039;s cheap to do, then anyone can do it, so there&#039;s no advantage of time to raid/goldbuying that affects current pvp. You&#039;d think pvpers would love this idea, not hate it. Sure it also means you have to be careful when attacking, but isn&#039;t that part of the thrill? It injects more uncertainty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s use for RPers and just people wanting to look nicer is obvious.</p>
<p>For PvPers, I don&#8217;t see what&#8217;s wrong with letting people hide their &#8220;True&#8221; armor. Most casual pvpers won&#8217;t know the armor by look anyway. Plus, it&#8217;s just one more way to obfuscate. If it&#8217;s cheap to do, then anyone can do it, so there&#8217;s no advantage of time to raid/goldbuying that affects current pvp. You&#8217;d think pvpers would love this idea, not hate it. Sure it also means you have to be careful when attacking, but isn&#8217;t that part of the thrill? It injects more uncertainty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Braack</title>
		<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2007/09/16/first-best-second-best/comment-page-1/#comment-24140</link>
		<dc:creator>Braack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 15:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killtenrats.com/?p=1233#comment-24140</guid>
		<description>Without changing itemization, you have to create a new &quot;accessory&quot; items to go over existing skins.

For example, simple dye colors, etc, as a start, but even further than that, have craftable items (shoulder spikes? Additional plates/padding?) or items from quest rewards (goblin skulls, Bear claws) that can be placed at various &quot;anchors&quot; on armor pieces

So now, you can color your armor, and add some flair. It wouldn&#039;t be easy, but it would be MUCH easier than either recreating the entire wheel, and much less silly than a  100 armor pink bikini.

(I would still vote for recreating the entire wheel, personally =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without changing itemization, you have to create a new &#8220;accessory&#8221; items to go over existing skins.</p>
<p>For example, simple dye colors, etc, as a start, but even further than that, have craftable items (shoulder spikes? Additional plates/padding?) or items from quest rewards (goblin skulls, Bear claws) that can be placed at various &#8220;anchors&#8221; on armor pieces</p>
<p>So now, you can color your armor, and add some flair. It wouldn&#8217;t be easy, but it would be MUCH easier than either recreating the entire wheel, and much less silly than a  100 armor pink bikini.</p>
<p>(I would still vote for recreating the entire wheel, personally =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kalamaf</title>
		<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2007/09/16/first-best-second-best/comment-page-1/#comment-24137</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalamaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 13:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killtenrats.com/?p=1233#comment-24137</guid>
		<description>Limiting the appearance slots to armor you can wear would just make it unfair to the people who can&#039;t wear plate.  A plate wearer can also wear chain, leather or cloth, whereas a cloth wearer can only wear cloth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Limiting the appearance slots to armor you can wear would just make it unfair to the people who can&#8217;t wear plate.  A plate wearer can also wear chain, leather or cloth, whereas a cloth wearer can only wear cloth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random Poster</title>
		<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2007/09/16/first-best-second-best/comment-page-1/#comment-24136</link>
		<dc:creator>Random Poster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 11:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killtenrats.com/?p=1233#comment-24136</guid>
		<description>They could avoid the whole disguising your class deal by simply limiting your appearance slot to armor you can normally wear..and I do mean armor, no social clothing should be able to fit in these slots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They could avoid the whole disguising your class deal by simply limiting your appearance slot to armor you can normally wear..and I do mean armor, no social clothing should be able to fit in these slots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unbeliever</title>
		<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2007/09/16/first-best-second-best/comment-page-1/#comment-24134</link>
		<dc:creator>unbeliever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 05:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killtenrats.com/?p=1233#comment-24134</guid>
		<description>why fix whats not broken, bikini plate mail is sexy! *me runs in circles screaming*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why fix whats not broken, bikini plate mail is sexy! *me runs in circles screaming*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

