<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speculating on WoW&#8217;s successor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.killtenrats.com/2008/04/18/speculating-on-wows-successor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2008/04/18/speculating-on-wows-successor/</link>
	<description>a group of adventurers on an epic quest</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2008/04/18/speculating-on-wows-successor/#comment-26334</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killtenrats.com/?p=1556#comment-26334</guid>
		<description>You know, I think companies have already started to, like &lt;a href="http://www.nexon.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Nexon&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.threerings.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Three Rings.&lt;/a&gt;  The graphics technology for their games is probably at a mid-to-late nineties level, so they're very consciously prioritizing accessibility and gameplay over visual impact.

But yeah, it still feels like there's a reasonably heavy focus on graphics, doesn't it?  Though I do feel it's decreasing.

I think the word "graphics" in marketing literature and such is an indicator.  "Graphics" is like "special effects" in Hollywood movies, it's a focus on the technology.  I'm more interested in games that talk about, say, "visuals."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I think companies have already started to, like <a href="http://www.nexon.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.nexon.com');">Nexon</a> and <a href="http://www.threerings.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.threerings.com');">Three Rings.</a>  The graphics technology for their games is probably at a mid-to-late nineties level, so they&#8217;re very consciously prioritizing accessibility and gameplay over visual impact.</p>
<p>But yeah, it still feels like there&#8217;s a reasonably heavy focus on graphics, doesn&#8217;t it?  Though I do feel it&#8217;s decreasing.</p>
<p>I think the word &#8220;graphics&#8221; in marketing literature and such is an indicator.  &#8220;Graphics&#8221; is like &#8220;special effects&#8221; in Hollywood movies, it&#8217;s a focus on the technology.  I&#8217;m more interested in games that talk about, say, &#8220;visuals.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2008/04/18/speculating-on-wows-successor/#comment-26332</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 06:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killtenrats.com/?p=1556#comment-26332</guid>
		<description>If devs from other companies understood this, the world would be a better place, and I'd have viable alternatives to WoW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If devs from other companies understood this, the world would be a better place, and I&#8217;d have viable alternatives to WoW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
