<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jalum reviews Conan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.killtenrats.com/2008/05/12/jalum-reviews-conan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2008/05/12/jalum-reviews-conan/</link>
	<description>a group of adventurers on an epic quest</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seen in May at Kill Ten Rats</title>
		<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2008/05/12/jalum-reviews-conan/comment-page-1/#comment-26688</link>
		<dc:creator>Seen in May at Kill Ten Rats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 05:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killtenrats.com/?p=1580#comment-26688</guid>
		<description>[...] and pretty much all of Tobold and Bildo&#8217;s sites for late May. Need a leveling flowchart? Jalum&#8217;s review that I linked earlier is probably non-relevant, especially since the miracle patch(es) seems to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and pretty much all of Tobold and Bildo&#8217;s sites for late May. Need a leveling flowchart? Jalum&#8217;s review that I linked earlier is probably non-relevant, especially since the miracle patch(es) seems to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ardwulf</title>
		<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2008/05/12/jalum-reviews-conan/comment-page-1/#comment-26524</link>
		<dc:creator>Ardwulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killtenrats.com/?p=1580#comment-26524</guid>
		<description>The amount of bad information in circulation about AoC is very high.  Jalum's review (which I have yet to see - the link is dead for me) would appear to fit into that category of bad information.  This is less Jalum's fault than it is Funcom's - it's their responsibility to get up-to-date information out to the public, and at this they have failed pretty miserably throughout the prelaunch countdown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The amount of bad information in circulation about AoC is very high.  Jalum&#8217;s review (which I have yet to see - the link is dead for me) would appear to fit into that category of bad information.  This is less Jalum&#8217;s fault than it is Funcom&#8217;s - it&#8217;s their responsibility to get up-to-date information out to the public, and at this they have failed pretty miserably throughout the prelaunch countdown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2008/05/12/jalum-reviews-conan/comment-page-1/#comment-26482</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killtenrats.com/?p=1580#comment-26482</guid>
		<description>It does seem that the game will look pretty bad on older computers. I just hope upgrading will be worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does seem that the game will look pretty bad on older computers. I just hope upgrading will be worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bildo</title>
		<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2008/05/12/jalum-reviews-conan/comment-page-1/#comment-26481</link>
		<dc:creator>Bildo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killtenrats.com/?p=1580#comment-26481</guid>
		<description>/hijack

http://bildos.blogspot.com/2008/05/bildos-age-of-conan-beta-review-long.html

/endhijack

Resume regular comment reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>/hijack</p>
<p><a href="http://bildos.blogspot.com/2008/05/bildos-age-of-conan-beta-review-long.html" rel="nofollow">http://bildos.blogspot.com/2008/05/bildos-age-of-conan-beta-review-long.html</a></p>
<p>/endhijack</p>
<p>Resume regular comment reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Openedge1</title>
		<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2008/05/12/jalum-reviews-conan/comment-page-1/#comment-26480</link>
		<dc:creator>Openedge1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killtenrats.com/?p=1580#comment-26480</guid>
		<description>I have the "recommended" system as noted in the specs for the game (and with Vista to boot)...and as anyone should know if you use minimum requirements on ANY game, you are going to have to turn something down..
Anyways...recommended system...the game ran 40-60FPS on high at 1440x900 on a 56" HDiLA TV...
Zero crashes, but as people were around, some minor hitching and some lows to ...GASP...30FPS..(but way better than LOTRO which everyone touts as the "stable" king)...and the gameplay was fun, refreshing, and really works (if you FOCUS, and learn how to do it...)...when I could control when my fatalities would happen, I knew I had it down pat!

The fact I keep seeing people say a "2nd Vanguard" etc is so far from the truth, it is pitiful what people will do to make a game look worse than it is...the doom and gloom was pretty sad..
The game ran flawlessly on 3 systems I have in house...3 different types of systems...all at "recommended" or higher spec...
This game is on my buy list for sure..

PS: As an added note..I also base gaming decisions on what my wife thinks of games...and a lot of people think AoC is geared towards males...so, when she played and got her first fatality within 5 minutes...she saw the blood spatter the screen...then said to me "Oh my...that was...satisfying!"...I knew AoC was going to be great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the &#8220;recommended&#8221; system as noted in the specs for the game (and with Vista to boot)&#8230;and as anyone should know if you use minimum requirements on ANY game, you are going to have to turn something down..<br />
Anyways&#8230;recommended system&#8230;the game ran 40-60FPS on high at 1440&#215;900 on a 56&#8243; HDiLA TV&#8230;<br />
Zero crashes, but as people were around, some minor hitching and some lows to &#8230;GASP&#8230;30FPS..(but way better than LOTRO which everyone touts as the &#8220;stable&#8221; king)&#8230;and the gameplay was fun, refreshing, and really works (if you FOCUS, and learn how to do it&#8230;)&#8230;when I could control when my fatalities would happen, I knew I had it down pat!</p>
<p>The fact I keep seeing people say a &#8220;2nd Vanguard&#8221; etc is so far from the truth, it is pitiful what people will do to make a game look worse than it is&#8230;the doom and gloom was pretty sad..<br />
The game ran flawlessly on 3 systems I have in house&#8230;3 different types of systems&#8230;all at &#8220;recommended&#8221; or higher spec&#8230;<br />
This game is on my buy list for sure..</p>
<p>PS: As an added note..I also base gaming decisions on what my wife thinks of games&#8230;and a lot of people think AoC is geared towards males&#8230;so, when she played and got her first fatality within 5 minutes&#8230;she saw the blood spatter the screen&#8230;then said to me &#8220;Oh my&#8230;that was&#8230;satisfying!&#8221;&#8230;I knew AoC was going to be great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bildo</title>
		<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2008/05/12/jalum-reviews-conan/comment-page-1/#comment-26477</link>
		<dc:creator>Bildo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killtenrats.com/?p=1580#comment-26477</guid>
		<description>Not to mention the 9600GT is uber cheap and runs just as well (if you get the superclocked version from EVGA).  Sure they won't hit WoW sub numbers, but Funcom knows that and never aimed for it.

This game will be their first mainstream hit, bugs or not, because it's ACTUALLY fun to play for those who can run it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention the 9600GT is uber cheap and runs just as well (if you get the superclocked version from EVGA).  Sure they won&#8217;t hit WoW sub numbers, but Funcom knows that and never aimed for it.</p>
<p>This game will be their first mainstream hit, bugs or not, because it&#8217;s ACTUALLY fun to play for those who can run it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rog</title>
		<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2008/05/12/jalum-reviews-conan/comment-page-1/#comment-26472</link>
		<dc:creator>Rog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 03:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killtenrats.com/?p=1580#comment-26472</guid>
		<description>Ethically, review a beta based upon game mechanics, not performance. There's plenty of time to review performance the day the game is out. 

There have been so many games where the beta performs wildly different than release, no matter how close or "gold" the game has gone. From most accounts, it's already improved since this review was written 10 days ago.

Developers always deserve the benefit of the doubt unless there's a bunch of other obvious problems going on at the company, etc.. This so clearly isn't the fiasco of Vanguard, which was a disaster in so many more ways than just performance.

That said, Funcom does list fairly high "recommended" system requirements. I'd say they're going for a niche market for sure. I'll happily play it, as I'm sure plenty of others will. Nvidia has certainly sold a great deal of 8800GT cards, check Steam's survey and you'll see it's the most common chipset now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethically, review a beta based upon game mechanics, not performance. There&#8217;s plenty of time to review performance the day the game is out. </p>
<p>There have been so many games where the beta performs wildly different than release, no matter how close or &#8220;gold&#8221; the game has gone. From most accounts, it&#8217;s already improved since this review was written 10 days ago.</p>
<p>Developers always deserve the benefit of the doubt unless there&#8217;s a bunch of other obvious problems going on at the company, etc.. This so clearly isn&#8217;t the fiasco of Vanguard, which was a disaster in so many more ways than just performance.</p>
<p>That said, Funcom does list fairly high &#8220;recommended&#8221; system requirements. I&#8217;d say they&#8217;re going for a niche market for sure. I&#8217;ll happily play it, as I&#8217;m sure plenty of others will. Nvidia has certainly sold a great deal of 8800GT cards, check Steam&#8217;s survey and you&#8217;ll see it&#8217;s the most common chipset now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boddler</title>
		<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2008/05/12/jalum-reviews-conan/comment-page-1/#comment-26471</link>
		<dc:creator>Boddler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 03:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killtenrats.com/?p=1580#comment-26471</guid>
		<description>I'd imagine the first comments by Artemis-X- hit the nail on the head--your friend's system is generationally older than what he believes it to be, and his technical problems aren't allowing him to see past them to the phenomenal game itself. 

This game really is a blast...  and you'll keep hearing that from many more people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d imagine the first comments by Artemis-X- hit the nail on the head&#8211;your friend&#8217;s system is generationally older than what he believes it to be, and his technical problems aren&#8217;t allowing him to see past them to the phenomenal game itself. </p>
<p>This game really is a blast&#8230;  and you&#8217;ll keep hearing that from many more people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
