<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Different Review Philosophies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.killtenrats.com/2008/10/12/different-review-philosophies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2008/10/12/different-review-philosophies/</link>
	<description>a group of adventurers on an epic quest</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex Taldren</title>
		<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2008/10/12/different-review-philosophies/comment-page-1/#comment-28096</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Taldren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 03:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killtenrats.com/?p=2187#comment-28096</guid>
		<description>It makes sense.  Video games are reviewed in a multitude of ways, and this is simply one of them.  You can review them based on other games in the genre, as they are by themselves, or compared to their sequels/prequels.  It really isn't a matter of right or wrong, but just preference.

Personally,  I think there should be defined categories of reviews.  The idea being that you could go to a site like Gamespot, look up a game like Call of Duty 4, and find a 4-5 reviews, each one being from a different philosophy with its own unique score.  Then you could have an average score based on the different review types.  Of course, this would probably be seen as a waste of time anyway, despite it being thorough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes sense.  Video games are reviewed in a multitude of ways, and this is simply one of them.  You can review them based on other games in the genre, as they are by themselves, or compared to their sequels/prequels.  It really isn&#8217;t a matter of right or wrong, but just preference.</p>
<p>Personally,  I think there should be defined categories of reviews.  The idea being that you could go to a site like Gamespot, look up a game like Call of Duty 4, and find a 4-5 reviews, each one being from a different philosophy with its own unique score.  Then you could have an average score based on the different review types.  Of course, this would probably be seen as a waste of time anyway, despite it being thorough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rog</title>
		<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2008/10/12/different-review-philosophies/comment-page-1/#comment-28086</link>
		<dc:creator>Rog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killtenrats.com/?p=2187#comment-28086</guid>
		<description>I suppose no car should be compared to other cars in auto reviews, or no restaurant compared to other restaurants, no laptop compared to other laptops, etc. etc..

What a silly concept. Reviews are comparative by their very nature, even if you do not mention the competition by name.

Sure, all of your reviews shouldn't be saying it's like X but with X, but if it's a game the reader is likely to know, it's a useful reference point.

This obsession lately with games for non-gamers is now turning into game reviews for non-gamers? To which, Penny Arcade answers well: http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2008/10/10/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose no car should be compared to other cars in auto reviews, or no restaurant compared to other restaurants, no laptop compared to other laptops, etc. etc..</p>
<p>What a silly concept. Reviews are comparative by their very nature, even if you do not mention the competition by name.</p>
<p>Sure, all of your reviews shouldn&#8217;t be saying it&#8217;s like X but with X, but if it&#8217;s a game the reader is likely to know, it&#8217;s a useful reference point.</p>
<p>This obsession lately with games for non-gamers is now turning into game reviews for non-gamers? To which, Penny Arcade answers well: <a href="http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2008/10/10/" rel="nofollow">http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2008/10/10/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2008/10/12/different-review-philosophies/comment-page-1/#comment-28085</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killtenrats.com/?p=2187#comment-28085</guid>
		<description>I think what they are trying to avoid is when you read a review for a game and they say, "Its just like Max Payne, only not as good."  What does that mean to you if you never played Max Payne? Or if you had never heard of Max Payne?  I don't think an outright ban on comparisons is needed, but using them can be "lazy" and leave your review inscrutable to gamers with less experience.  If you use a comparison, you have to be sure to follow up with what exactly that comparison means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what they are trying to avoid is when you read a review for a game and they say, &#8220;Its just like Max Payne, only not as good.&#8221;  What does that mean to you if you never played Max Payne? Or if you had never heard of Max Payne?  I don&#8217;t think an outright ban on comparisons is needed, but using them can be &#8220;lazy&#8221; and leave your review inscrutable to gamers with less experience.  If you use a comparison, you have to be sure to follow up with what exactly that comparison means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravious</title>
		<link>http://www.killtenrats.com/2008/10/12/different-review-philosophies/comment-page-1/#comment-28084</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killtenrats.com/?p=2187#comment-28084</guid>
		<description>I personally do not see how that is possible.  Playing other games will create in your mind a baseline of "fun."  It is a fine philosophy to write that way so as to not assume your readership have played Game X, but I agree with your stance, Zubon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally do not see how that is possible.  Playing other games will create in your mind a baseline of &#8220;fun.&#8221;  It is a fine philosophy to write that way so as to not assume your readership have played Game X, but I agree with your stance, Zubon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
