a group of adventurers on an epic quest
I will now get the highest score of any MMO pundit making predictions. Ready? “It will not go live in 2012.” Whatever we’re talking about, I’m predicting that it will slip into 2013, or later, or just never ship. The game, the expansion, whatever: not in 2012. I’m going to lose a few points, since something will ship in 2012, but I don’t see how anyone can beat my accuracy rate here.
: Zubon
For a game that depends on a stream of income from subscribers or RMT shoppers, the first hour of play must be the top development priority. This is where you hook players. After that, the endgame is important because that is where your players will be spending time indefinitely and where your game’s chatter will come from in the long run. Next is the early game, when you build momentum. The mid-game has already fallen this far down the list, as you have certainly seen in a lot of MMOs, and frankly few care much how good the late-game is because they are already fully committed and racing for the end-game.
I stand by my repeated claim that optimizing the new player experience is of paramount importance. You must grab my attention within five minutes, and you must deliver a satisfying hour or two for my first play session. Without that, any free trial is worthless, and you may even lose some people who have thrown down $50 for a box. This is the part of the game that every single player will see on every single character, and if you cannot do a good job here, I have no hope for the rest of the game. Yes, it is hard to make things interesting while giving the player only a few buttons to play with. Suck it up, we all have hard parts in our jobs. That’s why they pay us. Continue reading ‘Early, Middle, Late’
On one hand, this is a really great post about PvP from the perspective of someone with that K orientation who wants a PvP-based game. Syncaine makes all the points you would want about why someone wants PvP with consequences and who the niche is, with the awareness that it is a much smaller market than the PvE theme park I am currently trying. Even if you consider PvPers and Killers some foreign species, the post retains great anthropological value. It does not need my help to recommend it.
On the other hand, a lot of it comes down to “the niche is even smaller than previously realized.”
On the gripping hand, it is potentially the No True Scotsman fallacy in motion. The PvP game must be “well-executed” (grant the potentially tendentious claim that Darkfall is), which is the most common excuse for why the last five PvP-centric games failed. Players who quit did not really want meaningful PvP, because they cannot take losing to people who are better than them. And hey, both may be completely true in this case, but that becomes an increasingly narrow edge on which to balance as “the niche” gets defined down to an increasingly small population. Many players on that edge will bleed into the Fundamental Attribution Error: if I did not like the game, it was poorly executed; if you did not like that game, it’s because you are a whining loser noskillz carebear. I imagine someone on the Darkfall forums has made a hobby of tracking players’ moving from the second claim to the first as they ragequit.
: Zubon
A lot of the true PvP’ers discuss the need for penalty upon death. We aren’t talking about some pansy time-delimited death penalty (especially when you can just buy it off). We are talking about digital blood. Continue reading ‘The PvP Protectionists’
Lets be honest, Aventurine have not been ones to heed conventional wisdom when it comes to Darkfall. Lets look at how they differ.
1. If a bad review comes out, don’t post about it on your forums. The added attention will just get people who are already on your forums to read a review that says your game sucks. The more responses from the developers, the longer the controversy is dragged out.
Aventurine started 3 threads in 3 days in their “news” forum.
2. Make your forum big and flashy and often updated. It’s the first thing potential new players see.
Aventurine’s web site is lack-luster and rarely updated. Looking at darkfallonline.com, a user can’t immediately tell if the game has been released or if the game is in beta.
3. Let people buy your game. If you need more servers, quickly put more up within the first couple days.
If you can find the link to the store, you’ll find it’s offline approximately 23 hours of the day.
4. Don’t create a system where people can lose all their stuff. It’ll just cause them to quit when they can’t get their corpse or lose something special to them.
Aventurine’s design philosophy is designed around the exact opposite.
(or at least, one of many)
A long time ago and in a galaxy far, far away, I was a reviewer. People agreed or disagreed with my opinions, but far and by large everybody thought my reviews were fair and hitting the points that needed to be hit. I liked that, because that’s how I set out to do the reviews – as fair opinion that hits the highs and the lows equally. I did that gig for a little shy of two years, and got to review a few titles, so I’m sure I wasn’t catastrophic at it.
So if Adventurine (or whoever) is looking for a fair review, send me Darkfall. I have no intention of “playing” the game, so you can set me up with a timed account that expires whenever it reaches the number of hours you think it’s appropriate for a fair appreciation of the game. I might form my opinion earlier, or maybe the time expires and I have to make do with what I have (which I doubt). Also, since I have no veiled interest in this game one way or another, that’s probably the best place to be to approach a review. If it’s good, it’s good and if it’s bad it’s bad and no skin off my back in either case. Not planning on “playing it” regardless, since I’m about to start dealing with a house move soon.
All I offer is fair; if I think it’s good, good for you. If you think it’s bad, then eat it, basically. Drop me a line if interested. If not, best of lucks.
For Darkfall fans, I’m probably not their favorite blogger. Twice I’ve titled articles with the word “DarkFail” in it. But grumblings about me are nothing compared to the whirlwind the Eurogamer review has created. In the Darkfall general discussion forum today, 13 of the top 20 threads are about the Eurogamer review. Creatively, players in the game created a block of spam-text all stating “so and so has declared WAR on Eurogamer.net”
Darkfall players Protest Eurogamer
Such passion for an MMO is uncommon. Sure, people will insist the game they play is the best and call anyone who is biased towards a different game a “fanboy”, but for Darkfall fans it seems to go deeper. An assault on Darkfall is an assault on the playerbase itself.
Maybe it’s because Darkfall is so unique? No other MMO allows full player-killing and looting of their corpse anymore. For fans of that kind of gameplay, Darkfall is their last hope.
A response came back from Aventurine. They said we played two hours, but No! we played nine. To see everything. To be everywhere. We stand behind Zitron, firm, but then… To be careful we will re-review it by Gillen. Nine is still enough for us to care. We do not like Darkfall, anywhere.
–Ravious
would you, could you, in the dark?
The word “schadenfreude” referrs to the guilty pleasure of watching other people fail. It’s like watching the Angry Video Game Nerd play Superman 64.
Today’s dose of schadenfreude comes from reading Eurogamer’s review of Darkfall. Eurogamer isn’t known for being the harshest reviewers in the biz. Dofus and and Conan both earned 8 out of 10 by their estimation. Even Pirates of the Burning Sea, which they describe as “broken” and “disjointed”, can get by with six-thumbs-up out of 10. So how did Darkfall Online fair? It got just 2 out of 10.
Here’s some quotes from the review that had me laughing:
“Enemies’ AI boils down to running in circles, which is actually surprisingly effective, considering how slow and floaty the controls tend to be.”
“Not even old-school EverQuest – which was actually graphically superior- felt quite as stiflingly slow and ponderous in its levelling curve.”
“It doesn’t even have the basic features that make up even the most lackluster and dull cookie-cutter MMOs”
“Underneath the lack of originality, there’s a hole where the game should be: a loose, incongruous mess of bad controls, horrible user interface, and broken combat system.”
“Even if you were so inclined to take part in this painful experience, it’s rather difficult to actually buy it.”
“It’s the emperor’s new clothes of 2009: such a marvellous game that only an idiot wouldn’t realise the beauty of the gaping holes in its content, its wonky control system, and its seemingly decade-old engine”
When I’m at work, supposedly working, I often read the Darkfall forums. I don’t play Darkfall, and I hope I never do, but I love their forums. I have a kind of sick sense of humor. I enjoy reading the cries of disappointed new players. I love hearing how broken and empty a game Darkfall is despite having launched their website eight years ago.
Today, I want to show-case their player base. This is a post on their forum:
Dirty[JOE]:
I came from darktide, when there was no rules. you entered a portal to farm levels, you died. over and over. my ua/melee/missle spec’ed tank ripped your ass up. over and over. you ran the field, you saw me, i raped you as you ran, pott’ed, didnt help, you knew you were dead. Tank Abbott gave you nightmares.
I love the amount of people here. Lots of farmers/EU’s/noobs. You are mine for the pillaging.
Be warned. All your everything belongs to me.
Dirty